1 registered members (szkom),
161
guests, and 2
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums69
Topics113,624
Posts1,341,354
Members1,807
|
Most Online731 Jan 14th, 2020
|
|
|
Anyone had legal problems with decat?
#1510735
07/10/2014 11:43
07/10/2014 11:43
|
The_Doc
Unregistered
|
The_Doc
Unregistered
|
Just to clarify, I don't mean for the MOT, I am assuming I will fail with a decat. But I would like to know if anyone has ever had any bother with the police, have you ever been pulled over and if so what did they say? Also, for anyone unfortunate enough to have made an insurance claim, did a decat cause any issue?
Incidentally, I bloody love the sound with a decat. I have a super sprint cat back and a straight through decat pipe. Not too loud but a more defined growl when you open it up
|
|
|
Re: Anyone had legal problems with decat?
[Re: ]
#1510752
07/10/2014 13:42
07/10/2014 13:42
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390 Essex
Trappy
Forum is my life
|
Forum is my life
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390
Essex
|
I'm sure someone far more clued-up on the subject on here once said that, technically, you don't need a cat on a car. You just need to be able to pass the emissions test. Clearly a Coupe wouldn't pass it without one but the police cannot say that at the side of the road. The most they can do is insist that you go for another emissions test. I may be talking total tosh (and so might the afforementioned FCCUK contributor) so take it with a spoon full of salt!
F****** b****** thing...
|
|
|
Re: Anyone had legal problems with decat?
[Re: ]
#1510771
07/10/2014 15:44
07/10/2014 15:44
|
GrahamL
Unregistered
|
GrahamL
Unregistered
|
They occasionally do roadside VOSA/emmisions testing and if the car fails badly they'll prevent you driving it away, insisting it's towed for "repair". They also have the power to seize a vehicle in extreme cases.
Most likely you'll just have to present a valid MOT certificate at local police station within 7 or 14 days or whatever.
I did run a de-cat on my 1st coupe and it did sound and perform better, but was a pain in the ass come MoT time unless you know a very friendly tester.
I wouldn't run a de-cat now as not that bothered about small gains v's hassle + it does significantly shorten the life of the standard turbo.
|
|
|
Re: Anyone had legal problems with decat?
[Re: H_R]
#1510797
07/10/2014 18:28
07/10/2014 18:28
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390 Essex
Trappy
Forum is my life
|
Forum is my life
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390
Essex
|
As a matter of interest has there ever been a direct comparison on a car with and without a cat, on the same rolling road same day etc. would be interesting to see the results!
Not that I'm aware of but I should think at least 5% more power and a lot more throttle response. It's a huge restriction!
F****** b****** thing...
|
|
|
Re: Anyone had legal problems with decat?
[Re: Trappy]
#1510831
07/10/2014 20:45
07/10/2014 20:45
|
RoyH
Unregistered
|
RoyH
Unregistered
|
I was lucky enough with my last coupe to have a play with it de-catted in a test centre. We found that if the car was very warm (from a good thrash, hot Turbo etc) the car would have passed its MOT. Once it cooled it was miles out.
So yes, cat required
Roy
|
|
|
Re: Anyone had legal problems with decat?
[Re: H_R]
#1510853
07/10/2014 22:18
07/10/2014 22:18
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 33,568 Berlin
barnacle
Club Member 18 - ex-Minister without Portfolio
|
Club Member 18 - ex-Minister without Portfolio
Forum Demigod
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 33,568
Berlin
|
Also, it's a fail if a car which should have had a cat fitted, hasn't - which is basically everything from 1993 or so. As a matter of interest has there ever been a direct comparison on a car with and without a cat, on the same rolling road same day etc. would be interesting to see the results!
Several; here's one: http://www.importtuner.com/features/0610impp_catalytic_converter_removal/viewall.html - for some reason, I'm suspicious of the comparisons displayed by the tuners, all of which seem to show significant improvements! I've seen other magazine articles, again with the same insignificant differences.
|
|
|
Re: Anyone had legal problems with decat?
[Re: ]
#1510875
08/10/2014 09:59
08/10/2014 09:59
|
nissansteve
Unregistered
|
nissansteve
Unregistered
|
Vosa have enough to do with lgv stop and checks, mostly on foreign trucks entering / leaving the uk. It's far easier to make money from lorry drivers / owners than car drivers. Truck fines for Dog clip not engaged in fith wheel, fine Tyres, fine / points Lights, fine Missing number plates, fine Load security, fine Weight, (truck not the driver lol) fine Tachometer infringements, massive fines, points, prison
There's only prostitution that carries similar risks of going to prison than being a lorry driver.
So unless they are positively targeting cars, for example red diesel use we're pretty safe from roadside inspections and prohibition orders as car drivers.
Last edited by nissansteve; 08/10/2014 10:01. Reason: Sarcasm edit
|
|
|
Re: Anyone had legal problems with decat?
[Re: ]
#1510884
08/10/2014 12:28
08/10/2014 12:28
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 382 UK
Downhillryder
Making a profit
|
Making a profit
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 382
UK
|
Agree - my car came with a 2.7" decat system and I want to get legal preferably without loosing power. (See my thread here. ) However due to the current configuration on the car there seem to be no alternatives short of fitting a new exhaust system or hacking what's there, neither are cheap options and hacking it would ruin what must have been an expensive system. Seems there are are plenty of ways to make the car illegal but not many to make it legal. I get the impression that most on this board would say "don't bother". !
|
|
|
Re: Anyone had legal problems with decat?
[Re: szkom]
#1510908
08/10/2014 15:33
08/10/2014 15:33
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 21,071 Chertsey in the Thames
bockers
Hon Club Member 007
|
Hon Club Member 007
Forum Fossil
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 21,071
Chertsey in the Thames
|
Just wondering, how do you declare a non road legal mod to your insurance? You don't do the mod.
|
|
|
Re: Anyone had legal problems with decat?
[Re: ]
#1510936
08/10/2014 18:40
08/10/2014 18:40
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 360 England, Devon
lost55
Club member 2057
|
Club member 2057
Making a profit
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 360
England, Devon
|
Bear in mind that insurance companies don't pay out if they can help it. If you have to refit a cat to get a car through an MOT then removing it after the test must mean its then no longer road legal and your insurance is then invalid. In the event of an accident I think any insurance company would state that your insurance was not valid even though lack of a cat wasn't a factor in the accident. That means you would be persoinally liable for the costs associated with the accident. Not good
|
|
|
Re: Anyone had legal problems with decat?
[Re: ]
#1510940
08/10/2014 19:11
08/10/2014 19:11
|
Big_Muzzie
Unregistered
|
Big_Muzzie
Unregistered
|
Unless the lack of a cat caused you to have more performance and increased the risk of an accident occurring, of course......
|
|
|
Re: Anyone had legal problems with decat?
[Re: ]
#1510943
08/10/2014 19:56
08/10/2014 19:56
|
Big_Muzzie
Unregistered
|
Big_Muzzie
Unregistered
|
testing manual section 7.1 rfr 3 - You must have a CAT fit or you fail. By visual inspection, so technically you could have a dummy CAT, a map so your car runs lean at MOT test revs / under no load and pass emissions and be OK. You can't dismantle a car for an MOT so they can't check if the item purporting to be a CAT is actually real.
But, as it makes your car un road worthy, you couldn't declare no CAT as a modification and legally drive on the road as you've just nulled* your MOT and hence your insurance.
*you can have OK tyres at MOT time, they can become illegal during the year and that would also invalidate your insurance.
Edit - LPG cars don't fail with the cat removed.
Last edited by Big_Muzzie; 08/10/2014 20:00. Reason: LPG
|
|
|
Re: Anyone had legal problems with decat?
[Re: ]
#1511869
16/10/2014 15:44
16/10/2014 15:44
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,289 Malvern
coupe_integrale
My job on the forum
|
My job on the forum
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,289
Malvern
|
Just to confuse things even more...
Regardless of the age of your car, if you can prove that the engine fitted is from before than the year the requirement for a cat came in then you're ok.
So if you can find pre-cat lump from a Delta or similar then you could be legal without one... though unless you're short of an engine to start with (which I was) it's much easier to just run a cat!
Fiat Coupe Integrale
|
|
|
|