2 registered members (FABIAN, 1 invisible),
204
guests, and 1
spider. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums69
Topics113,948
Posts1,344,213
Members1,629
|
Most Online1,570 Dec 2nd, 2024
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: ]
#541253
13/02/2008 20:48
13/02/2008 20:48
|
dink
Unregistered
|
dink
Unregistered
|
Stop talking about the evocars chip. If makes the car feel sluggish, does not holds boost at high rpm and it has chronic overfueling. AFR's are 1:10 or less. All you get is a big whallop of torque and then... NOTHING.
Bazza, if you're looking from heaven (or hell) forgive me but it's true.
If you want a good chip, talk to me.
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: ]
#541287
13/02/2008 21:34
13/02/2008 21:34
|
Blueman
Unregistered
|
Blueman
Unregistered
|
uprated brakes YES IF RACING HARD
Erm, you only think it necessary if racing hard? Power has increased by 50% or more, brakes are a definite.
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: crgracing]
#541308
13/02/2008 22:27
13/02/2008 22:27
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,289 spain
crgracing
OP
My job on the forum
|
OP
My job on the forum
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,289
spain
|
im aiming for 250bhp to start of with 300 to much money . lots of peolpe that have evocars chip in their 16vT say it works ok . what do you recomand me then?
Last edited by crgracing; 13/02/2008 22:28.
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: crgracing]
#541350
13/02/2008 23:35
13/02/2008 23:35
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,895 New Zealand
Saint
My life on the forum
|
My life on the forum
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,895
New Zealand
|
niose it is very doable, I have made a dyno proven 250bhp+ on the standard turbo and evocars chip Dyno graph with CRG mod list and sip Shows 159KW at the wheels at less than 1bar on the factory turbo. KW to BHP is divide by .74 so 215bhp ATW, then allowing for a conservation 15% tranmission loss (normal 20%) 215bhp at the wheels is 253bhp engine, with 20% tranmission loss more like 265bhp Crg there is no reason you won't get similar with your mod list Cheers
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: crgracing]
#541356
13/02/2008 23:44
13/02/2008 23:44
|
paulinho
Unregistered
|
paulinho
Unregistered
|
Mine´s at 259hp and 395nm of torque still with original turbo with Evochip And holds boost very well (now much better with the ACDELCO), supersprint full exhaust with decat, Kn filter with drilled airbox, balancer belt removed, Evochip at 1.4bar, DV006 dump, 3bar fpr. I tested in 2 diferent rollers with just the 3hp difference (the other one gave 262hp) Maybe help the car doesn´t have much km´s
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: crgracing]
#541373
14/02/2008 00:07
14/02/2008 00:07
|
dink
Unregistered
|
dink
Unregistered
|
Saint, your test was done with a boost controller right, the evocars holds about 13psi (0,9bar) at midrange and around 10psi (0,7bar) at redline.
Any chance you have a graph Paulinho? What was your AFR, were you wasting fuel for nothing or not?
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: crgracing]
#541374
14/02/2008 00:07
14/02/2008 00:07
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
to BLUEMAN : yep, I had alfa 155q4 with +320hp and original brakes.. stops good. same brakes, but 200kg more weight. but if having some extra money and wanna be sure.. of course. and me myself, I m gonna chance originals for bigger one..
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: crgracing]
#541377
14/02/2008 00:13
14/02/2008 00:13
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
DINK: we all want to know what is the good chip, if evochip is not ?
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: crgracing]
#541382
14/02/2008 00:46
14/02/2008 00:46
|
dink
Unregistered
|
dink
Unregistered
|
jtm,
you have your fuel pressure at 3,4bar, i don't know how much boost you are running at the top end nor how much at midrange. How do you expect me to give you a plug an play chip?
Point is, people are modding their cars with god knows what and then ask what's the perfect chip? That would be a livemap.
If you only care about max power and the corresponding AFR at the top end, the evochip isn't too bad because it gives a margin for error.
Is it more responsive than the stock chip off boost? NO, it's worse Is there a massive difference in ignition advance in high rpm? NO Is it more economic even when you're not bootin it? Nope Is it maybe overfueling off boost and midregion? Yes Does it give more fuel at the top end than the stock chip? Just a little bit.
I can provide a good chip that gives you out of the box around 230hp with more top end power than the evocars and a fuel efficiency better than the stock one or the evocars.
I'm not recommending it but it can be used with a boost controller, a slightly bigger turbo 60trim for instance, 3bar regulator and a good FMIC to give around 270hp. yes you need to verify the AFR and EGT if you want to push 1bar at the top end. More than 1bar top end makes the EGT's rise dramatically.
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: ]
#541411
14/02/2008 01:21
14/02/2008 01:21
|
paulinho
Unregistered
|
paulinho
Unregistered
|
"the evocars holds about 13psi (0,9bar) at midrange " Wrong! 1.4/1.5 midrange and 0.9 redline (due to turbo limitations) The Evocars chip is indeed more responsive and drivable of boost Massive ignition advance on in high rpm maybe not very good for engine (it´s really massive off boost and that is one of the main reasons why the car is more responsive off boost) About the fuelling issues i don´t know cause i never checked that. I run this chip for 4 years and for me it´s the election chip from those that i´ve tested (Evocars, Superchips, Abarth and Dimsport) Eaven the Dimsport one is a reaaallly close Evocars chip The feedback that i´ve got from the chip is very positive overall but i also doesn´t say that there is no better then this. About the print of the rr i think that i´ve posted in FCCUK some time ago
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: crgracing]
#541416
14/02/2008 01:30
14/02/2008 01:30
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
DINK : 1.4 bar pressure and livemap.
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: crgracing]
#541420
14/02/2008 01:33
14/02/2008 01:33
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
and for the evochip goodnes: walbro+3.5bar fuel+gt28rs+evochip etc = 340hp afr at around 12 in high revs. so no livemap.
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: ]
#541440
14/02/2008 01:49
14/02/2008 01:49
|
dink
Unregistered
|
dink
Unregistered
|
DINK : 1.4 bar pressure and livemap. No comment. "the evocars holds about 13psi (0,9bar) at midrange " Wrong! 1.4/1.5 midrange and 0.9 redline (due to turbo limitations) The Evocars chip is endeed more responsive drivable of boost Massive ignition advance on in high rpm maybe not very good for engine (it´s really massive off boost and that is one of the main reasons why the car is more responsive off boost) About the fuelling issues i don´t know cause i never checked that.
BOLLOCKS! It's overfueling on every single car we tried it on, the moment you even touch the gas the AFR is dropping to 1:11. Driving 120-130km/h it's not even in the stoich range, more like 1:13! I won't comment on this any more, i don't fight for a lost cause!
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: ]
#541445
14/02/2008 01:56
14/02/2008 01:56
|
paulinho
Unregistered
|
paulinho
Unregistered
|
JTM---> With 0.86 A/R housing right? I would also like 300hp but without much lag
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: crgracing]
#541447
14/02/2008 02:10
14/02/2008 02:10
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: crgracing]
#541448
14/02/2008 02:11
14/02/2008 02:11
|
paulinho
Unregistered
|
paulinho
Unregistered
|
crgracing---> I´ve tested the ACDELCO valve and i was very suprised with it! It´s really cheap and works very fine, with it you also still have the safety features. I had one "ball and spring" PRV and it didn´t work to well cause sometimes the ball was stuck and the car had massive overboosting causing the MAP to "cut" the motor. But that was my personal experience with it. You know that like everything, there are good things and bad.
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: crgracing]
#541463
14/02/2008 02:44
14/02/2008 02:44
|
paulinho
Unregistered
|
paulinho
Unregistered
|
Nope... The ACDELCO is a EBV (electronic bleed valve) like our standard one but it works better (That is the valve that the ECU uses to control the turbo boost). I think that you are confusing with a BOV (blow of valve or dump-valve), this one is used to discharge the compressed air when you lift of the throttle for not stalling the turbo. About this one i am using a Forge DV006 with the softer spring (yellow or green i can´t remember), but it´s a little for the expensive side. If i am wrong, anyone please correct me here
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: ]
#541464
14/02/2008 02:45
14/02/2008 02:45
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,895 New Zealand
Saint
My life on the forum
|
My life on the forum
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,895
New Zealand
|
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: Saint]
#541498
14/02/2008 03:43
14/02/2008 03:43
|
Kenneth
Unregistered
|
Kenneth
Unregistered
|
When my car was "standard" i did also use the evochip, and i think it is a great chip.
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: ]
#541506
14/02/2008 03:50
14/02/2008 03:50
|
Vas
Unregistered
|
Vas
Unregistered
|
+1 on what dink says I'm afraid. Tried evocars chip on a few cars down here. Smell of petrol, overfueling badly, crappy idle, engine check on unless you blipped the throttle, etc. Oddly enough, it worked relatively OK on mine (ONLY out of 4 cars tested!) Couple of the guys came back to me saying they wanted another chip, so eventually started delivering a cross between something that dink gave me months ago and puceabarth. Slightly less push, but car runs stoich on cruising (no 13.2AFR at 3Krpm for no apparent reason, unboosted) and it's good on fuel. Decent morning starts as well V.
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: crgracing]
#541523
14/02/2008 04:29
14/02/2008 04:29
|
paulinho
Unregistered
|
paulinho
Unregistered
|
Easy to find It´s the cilindrical shaped part with 1 pipe on top and two at the bottom with a electrical plug. It´s located on top right of the radiator No need for an EBC, you can use the EBV that it´s controlled by the ECU (standard EBV is pierburg that must be the one that you have or an better one like perrin, acdelco etc.)
Last edited by paulinho; 14/02/2008 04:33.
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: ]
#541562
14/02/2008 05:39
14/02/2008 05:39
|
paulinho
Unregistered
|
paulinho
Unregistered
|
About that puceabarth file... JMA at the time send me that file, like it sent to you also. When i checked the file it was 100% equal to another that i downloaded from the net before he sent me. Check the idle and also injection and ignition rpm breakpoints in that file. Who guess what car is that file from? About the blip in throttle for the injection to go out usually is TPS sensor not chip fault. Evocars chip gives the injection light error (due to an eprom checksum fault) but it´s just during the first 15 or so seconds.
Last edited by paulinho; 14/02/2008 05:40.
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: ]
#541604
14/02/2008 13:36
14/02/2008 13:36
|
dink
Unregistered
|
dink
Unregistered
|
Who guess what car is that file from? that's easy, delta EVO2
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: ]
#541606
14/02/2008 13:46
14/02/2008 13:46
|
paulinho
Unregistered
|
paulinho
Unregistered
|
No...wrong That file is from a Ford Escort Cosworth, same Weber-Marelli IAW P8 management system.
|
|
|
Re: to get 300bhp for a 16vT
[Re: ]
#541614
14/02/2008 13:58
14/02/2008 13:58
|
noise
Unregistered
|
noise
Unregistered
|
Tried evocars chip on a few cars down here. Smell of petrol, overfueling badly, crappy idle, engine check on unless you blipped the throttle, etc. Oddly enough, it worked relatively OK on mine (ONLY out of 4 cars tested!)
and ignitionlight on , right ? =) the evo-chip is out of date .. there are sure some better chips available but the best is still a livemapping .. (ps: the german grale guys are lougthing on evocarchip users .. )
|
|
|
|