0 registered members (),
245
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums69
Topics113,822
Posts1,342,985
Members1,645
|
Most Online731 Jan 14th, 2020
|
|
|
De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239721
17/11/2006 06:15
17/11/2006 06:15
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
As above... as they are a bit of a grey area.
As far as the Police are concered, they are a no-no. How do insurers see this?
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239722
17/11/2006 06:32
17/11/2006 06:32
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,459 Both feet in Meldrew Ave
Cappo
Forum is my life
|
Forum is my life
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,459
Both feet in Meldrew Ave
|
Well, if you don't declare it, you're not insured, and if you do declare it, it's a non roadworthy vehicle which an insurance company wouldn't cover. You do the math!! ![](/forum/images/graemlins/tongue.gif)
Habeus Maximus V8 Nihilum
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239723
17/11/2006 06:37
17/11/2006 06:37
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Thought so, not worth it!
How many out there are technically not insured then? A frightening thought.
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239724
17/11/2006 14:35
17/11/2006 14:35
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
Well, if you don't declare it, you're not insured, and if you do declare it, it's a non roadworthy vehicle which an insurance company wouldn't cover.
You do the math!!
Certain cars dont have cats, and some pass without cats through the mot. Supposedly, if you can pass an mot your car is roadworthy, hence if you dont have a cat its nearer here nor there. However, we all know that coupes dont pass without cats.
Ross
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239725
17/11/2006 18:28
17/11/2006 18:28
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
"All" petrol cars had to have a cat from mid 92 onwards, so this is a requirement.
If you take it off though where would you stand with the insurers as technically it is illegal?
As stated above, looks like those of us without one are technically not insured.
Imagine the scene.. car pranged and immovable, car towed away to garage for insurance assessor to look at. Assessor sees cat removed and declares car isn't insured so a total loss. Youv'e also hit another car, your insurers will not pay out on this either. Other driver get's police involved as you were technically not insured. What would be the consequences? A criminal record?
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239726
17/11/2006 18:35
17/11/2006 18:35
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
You could just hollow out a Cat or put a pipe through one. That way to an insurance assessor it loks fine and u still get the performance increase.
They would only know if the accident caused the exhuast to break in the area of the cat.
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239727
17/11/2006 20:22
17/11/2006 20:22
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
could always get a sports cat, best of both worlds then. The other problem with a de-cat is that the Turbo's don't last as long due to the lack of back-pressure.
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239729
17/11/2006 21:17
17/11/2006 21:17
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
So basically all de-cat cars the UK over are not insured then!
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239730
17/11/2006 22:08
17/11/2006 22:08
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,546 Northumberland
AndrewR
I AM a Coop
|
I AM a Coop
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,546
Northumberland
|
Quote:
Imagine the scene.. car pranged and immovable, car towed away to garage for insurance assessor to look at. Assessor sees cat removed and declares car isn't insured so a total loss. Youv'e also hit another car, your insurers will not pay out on this either. Other driver get's police involved as you were technically not insured. What would be the consequences? A criminal record?
It's virtually impossible for insurers to avoid paying to 3rd parties on technicalities like this, although they could launch a civil case to reclaim any loses.
As the insurance company would be forced, by law, to pay for the other damages the police wouldn't be interested in persuing a driving without insurance charge and, even if they did, it's a civil offence not a criminal one, so you couldn't possibly get a criminal record.
That said, it is quite possible they'd refuse to pay out for the 1st party damage and you probably wouldn't have a leg to stand on.
Dear monos, a secret truth.
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239732
17/11/2006 22:18
17/11/2006 22:18
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
hmm interesting, i declared my (future) exhaust as being " 3 inch turbo back sports exhaust" i wonder if i could argue this if i had an accident.
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239734
17/11/2006 23:34
17/11/2006 23:34
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,546 Northumberland
AndrewR
I AM a Coop
|
I AM a Coop
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,546
Northumberland
|
I had an illegal end-can for 5.5 years and never had a problem getting it insured ... mind you, I got through 2 MOTs as well.
Dear monos, a secret truth.
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239735
20/11/2006 20:57
20/11/2006 20:57
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Thats true, I had a Akrapovic full race system on my R1 (no cat, minimal baffles) and it was fully declared on the insurance and they were fine with it. It's illegal on both emissions and noise.
I think with motorbikes things are a little bit more leniant on the basis that a bike with a big exhaust is less likely to be in an accident because the id0it in the car is more likely to hear you and not pull across your path.
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239736
20/11/2006 22:05
20/11/2006 22:05
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Ive declared and im insured but this is a rare circumstance and loophole in the law ![](/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif) Any standard coop without a cat will fail on the spot MOT checks and be illegal to drive. If you want to run the risk of seeing if your insurance co will find it come claim time thats yuor chance but a no thanks from me ![](/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif)
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239737
21/11/2006 01:44
21/11/2006 01:44
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 54 Welwyn Garden City
CoupeKarter
Club member 1965
|
Club member 1965
Reaping the fruits
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 54
Welwyn Garden City
|
There is no legal requirement to have a cat, working or otherwise, fitted to your vehicle. There is a legal requirement for your vehicle to comply with the emission limits when on the public roads. Removal of the cat represents a change that should be declared to an insurer. If the insurer accepts the change, they would have to pay up in a claim situation. But if plod sees the cat-less exhaust you could be prosecuted for driving an unroadworthy vehicle.
"To race is to live, all the rest is simply waiting." Rudolf Carraciola.
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239738
21/11/2006 04:13
21/11/2006 04:13
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
.......surely though & this is a theoretical idea, if YOUR coop actually could pass on emissions without a CAT, then technically it's legal as it passes the emissions requirements ![](/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif) I've always run a race CAT & it always passes, HOWEVER, oddly enuf isn't it also TRUE that EVERY petrol car fails an emission test when started up from cold ? So then this MUST mean that every car is legally breaking the law at one point during the day ![](/forum/images/graemlins/crazy.gif) ..depends how strictly you take the law to be. I am going to see if I can get my coop to run right without a CAT when the engine is up n' running, else I'll have to stump up for a MEGA high flow CAT ![](/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif)
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239739
21/11/2006 04:17
21/11/2006 04:17
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The insurance wouldnt pay out though as the car wouldnt pass the MOT for emmisions. if they spot checked you on the road, and yes i have seen it done. and tested the cars output it wouldnt pass and having a non valid MOT means no insurance as the car is not road legal then.
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239740
21/11/2006 04:20
21/11/2006 04:20
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
.....the point is though will, that IF the coop actually could pass an MOT without a CAT ( hence the reason they are fitted ) , then there is NO reason to have an invalid MOT ever ![](/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif) ( that is providing the rest of the car meets the MOT requirements ) But, agreed, on a boggo Coop, they would ALWAYS fail on emissions normally... even if you do fail ( eg : A genuine CAT failure ) then you have 5 - 7 days to have it fixed : Well that used to be a long time ago IIRC ![](/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif)
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239742
21/11/2006 17:58
21/11/2006 17:58
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Yes but they will only allow you to the MOT station and back and to a place of for the work to be carried out and back home.
They will also corroberate this with the booking place as well.
We all know how tight the DVLA and the Police are regarding these kinda things so personally i wouldnt take the chance and add in the fact that an insurance company will use any reason they can to get out of paying up, not a good idea.
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239743
21/11/2006 18:07
21/11/2006 18:07
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,546 Northumberland
AndrewR
I AM a Coop
|
I AM a Coop
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,546
Northumberland
|
I agree that it's not a good idea, but insurance companies can't arbitarily decide not to pay up.
If, for example, you drove into the back of somebody and you have a duff brake light an argument that your vehicle was unroadworthy wouldn't cut much mustard, as it clearly wasn't a contributory factor in the accident.
It's the same with the exhaust - if you don't declare it then it's misrepresentation of a material fact and they've got you bang to rights, but if they accepted it as an insured risk I think they'd find it impossible to back out of paying out anything.
Dear monos, a secret truth.
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239744
26/11/2006 18:06
26/11/2006 18:06
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
.......surely though & this is a theoretical idea, if YOUR coop actually could pass on emissions without a CAT, then technically it's legal as it passes the emissions requirements ![](/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif)
No, our cars are legally required to have a cat, regardless of the emissions.
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239745
26/11/2006 18:08
26/11/2006 18:08
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
I agree that it's not a good idea, but insurance companies can't arbitarily decide not to pay up.
As I understand it, if you don't declare something to them, then they can only decide not to pay-out to you if it is a factor in the claim. I assume that they will always pay-out to third parties, but may then sue you for the payment.
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239746
28/11/2006 01:32
28/11/2006 01:32
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
I agree that it's not a good idea, but insurance companies can't arbitarily decide not to pay up.
If, for example, you drove into the back of somebody and you have a duff brake light an argument that your vehicle was unroadworthy wouldn't cut much mustard, as it clearly wasn't a contributory factor in the accident.
It's the same with the exhaust - if you don't declare it then it's misrepresentation of a material fact and they've got you bang to rights, but if they accepted it as an insured risk I think they'd find it impossible to back out of paying out anything.
So true.
They are regulated so cant just decide not to pay. I very much doubt that emissions would EVER cause an accident.
Ross
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239747
28/11/2006 06:03
28/11/2006 06:03
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239748
28/11/2006 21:42
28/11/2006 21:42
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
No, our cars are legally required to have a cat, regardless of the emissions.
I think you will find this to be true so any de-cat pipes are therefore illegal. Pre- '92 and you are okay.
I think in extreme cases i.e. persistant use of a de-cat the vehicle could be confiscated.
But on the subject of insurance I'm still convinced that the policy is null and void should the car be involved in an accident. Technically, they cannot insure a non-roadworthy vehicle?
Anyone in the Motor Insurance game on here to shed some definative light on this one?
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239749
29/11/2006 06:52
29/11/2006 06:52
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
1. Insurance companies will only insure a car if its road legal in its country of registration. 2. if a car is not road legal due to a deliberate act by the user / keeper then the policy is not void, but becomes 3rd party only, so that other people dont loose out.
The answer is clear, move to the Isle of Man, where cats are not compulsory. (honestly - and no jokes re the tail missing)
|
|
|
Re: De-cat... are you technically insured?
#239750
29/11/2006 07:41
29/11/2006 07:41
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Could a Coupé pass the emissions test without a cat if it was running on LPG?
Kingpleb?
|
|
|
|