Fiat Coupe Club UK

Today at Perfect Touch

Posted By: Anonymous

Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 00:09

Well, GT28RS and Paddle clutch fitted i went to PT to get the car mapped. Results are as follows:

Maximum Power @ 1.4 bar - Wheels: 303.1bhp @ 6,263rpm
Maximum Power @ 1.4 bar - Fly: 327bhp @ 6,295rpm
Maximum Torque 291.1 lbft @ 5.250rpm

I had the car mapped on BP Ultimate, just to avoid me having to goto the shell in neasden everytime i want petrol.
Rob@PT reckoned i may have seen another 10-15bhp on V-Power but id rather lose power and not pink if i have to buy "other" fuel.

My injectors were nearing their limits and i asked him that he put safety first before power, so i could get a fair bit more out of the car but that will have to wait till next year and some bigger injectors, forged internals and headwork. (maybe \:D )
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 16:18

I reckon if i'm going to mod any further i'l be going with the GT28rs/r. Have already got the TI stage 2 head but no cams.

What injectors would be the next step?
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 16:18

384cc 16vt injectors.

Ross
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 16:22

Is that because you have a set for sale?
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 16:23

Not anymore. They are gone. But they are the next step up.

Ross
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 16:35

You can fuel 350 bhp and a bit over with 3.8 bar fuel pressure on the standard injectors - they are maxed out over 5,000 rpm at 300 bhp though, so not ideal.

If you go to bigger injectors you'll need the car live mapped or you have to go to an aftermarket ECU to control them properly - a unichip will control them, but only on boost. Apparently it's possible on a unichip, but so far no mapper has been able / willing to take that on as far as I know. if you're going bigger on the injectors you might as well go for 440's IMO.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 17:20

What other mods are you running with that? cant't belive the V-power difference!
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 17:23

 Originally Posted By: 13ad13oy
What other mods are you running with that? cant't belive the V-power difference!


Seeing is believing.

Ross
Posted By: mattB

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 17:28

Was this a live map? I notice your sig says unichip. Has that been removed or still there running the WI?
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 19:13

 Originally Posted By: 13ad13oy
cant't belive the V-power difference!


There was a company that did some testing on fuels with a rolling road on a BMW M3 and a couple of other cars too. Changing from 95ron to tesco's 99ron gave an extra 40 odd bhp on the M3 after putting the fuel in for 3 tanks or something!!! \:o

Mark
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 19:47

I have no WI, i will get a livemap next time, the Unichip is becoming obsolete now but it has kept me running safely for 2 years which has been its main benefit.

I went for a Unichip map as its relatively easy, livemaps are more difficult i heard and theres not much point in spending twice the money if im going to get more work done later.

My coupe has entered a new level in terms of performance, it feels seriously quick now and gets to silly speeds in a blink of the eye. The stupidly low transmission losses are accredited to the paddle clutch im assuming!
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 19:48

FWD ftw \:D
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 19:48

 Originally Posted By: Akeme
The stupidly low transmission losses are accredited to the paddle clutch im assuming!


More likely the rollers than PT are using. \:D

Ross
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 22:31

Akeme - what exhaust? I'd have expected you to get a little more torque than that.

Sparco - Both Alessandro and I have the RSR and TI stage 3 head. Results to follow. ;\)
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 22:37

Hayward & Scott 5 stud to v-band downpipe, after that its 2.25 decat all the way.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 22:38

How much torque you think i should have?
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 22:48

 Originally Posted By: Akeme
How much torque you think i should have?


I would have thought 300 lb/ft ... what were the ambient temps like?
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 22:52

Enviroment Temp was 25.5c
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 09/08/2007 22:56

Dunno - about 10-20ft\lbs more. But you did say thet you were running ultimate fuel and not v-power.

Ambient temps don't matter as the RR graphs adjust for that.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 10/08/2007 00:05

rob reccomended me to have tesco 99 when i had my last coop mapped!

thats what i use religeously anyway!
Posted By: Rog20VT

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 10/08/2007 00:33

yeah, cos they can advance the ignition that much more = more power.

Personally id take 20bhp less and have less ignition advance.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 10/08/2007 00:39

 Originally Posted By: Rog20VT
Personally id take 20bhp less and have less ignition advance.


What are the advanages of doing this?! Sorry, not too clued up in this area!!

Cheers,

Mark
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 10/08/2007 00:43

 Originally Posted By: Kenno
Dunno - about 10-20ft\lbs more. But you did say thet you were running ultimate fuel and not v-power.

Ambient temps don't matter as the RR graphs adjust for that.


Not always (and even then can they accurately correct for heat soak?), some just correct for transmission losses (I think there are different standard formulas they can use?) and his at the fly figure is not that much higher than his wheels figure ...? Most people running 1.4 midrange with a standard head seem to get 300 lb/ft?
Posted By: Flea

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 10/08/2007 00:55

The correction factors will take into account ambient temps, atmospheric pressure but they can't account for heat soak in the engine which can give slower torque build up and quicker drop off at the top end.

As far as power goes, air/fuel and spark timing... like Rog said, taking it to the ragged edge gives more power but the safety buffer becomes waifer thin.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 10/08/2007 05:49

Good results there, and nice its on 'standard' fuel as well

joe
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 10/08/2007 14:41

how much torque did you have joe?
and what bhp at wheels if you dont mind me asking.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 10/08/2007 17:15

No probs, at 1.5 bar 323 lb/ft and 313 bhp @wheels.

The results are good, by running higher octane fuel and adding water/methanol injection ,you could quite 'safely' run an extra couple of degrees advance, which would equate to 20-30 lbft/bhp.

I have to admit, that I am still far from convinced that there is much benefit in going for a live map as apposed to a Unichip map (other than running larger injectors), the Unichip also allows you to run dual ignition maps, say for water injection on/off, .or even 95/99ron fuel, which is not possible with a live map, that's why I stayed with the Unichip.

Joe
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 10/08/2007 17:20

Joe.... did you ever get your car rr'd anywhere else for a secondary opinion?

Ross
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 10/08/2007 17:23

Yep, Ross, I went to several other rollers , all gave within 5bhp of PTS, so I had no reason to doubt PTS.

However G-force rollers gave 20 lb/ft more than PTS at a Fiat coupe RR day,...... most found rather unusually higher torque figures that day.


joe
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 10/08/2007 17:25

 Originally Posted By: Doctorfrag
Yep, Ross, I went to several other rollers , all gave within 5bhp of PTS, so I had no reason to doubt PTS.

However G-force rollers gave 20 lb/ft more than PTS at a Fiat coupe RR day,...... most found rather unusually higher torque figures that day.


joe


The torque figure of 323 is v good. \:D

Was that just a peak? What was it flatlining at?

Ross
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 10/08/2007 17:27

i see thanks for that joe.
still debating whether gt28rs or stick with my rsr.
i have a live map but will prob go for a unichip as i have heard its been more reliable at the moment, and the fact about running dual ignition maps.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 10/08/2007 17:28

I dont think you would get much more from an rsr.

Ross
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 10/08/2007 17:30

sorry ross prob confused you i meant i allready have an rsr was thinking about a rs as i like the more aggresive punch higher up the rev range.
but i need to feel a rs again to finally decide.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 10/08/2007 17:34

Sorry. My mistake. I meant rs. Depends what version of the rs you go for. 0.64 housing aint gonna be much different. 0.86 would probably unleash quite a bit.

Ross
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 10/08/2007 17:36

the .86 will release more lag as well.lol
will see when i get back to london then.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 10/08/2007 17:39

sorry akeme i feel like i have highjacked your thread.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 10/08/2007 20:08

No worries dude!

Im happy with the results, i only ever run 1 bar for daily driving, afaik i got 307hp@fly at 1 bar which is more than enough for me.
Posted By: Freddan72

Re: Today at Perfect Touch - 11/08/2007 00:30

Any power/torque graphs Akeme?
© 2024 Fiat Coupe Club UK